Features
Industries
Who we serve
Resources
Sign in
Get Started - $500/month
No commitment. No implementation fee. Unlimited users
Long-running utility projects often lose institutional knowledge every time a contractor or employee turns over. After enough handoffs, nobody on the current crew was around when the original specs were written. The prints get inherited and assumed correct. And when they are not correct, the cost shows up as rework, wasted material, and blown outage windows.
A wire sizing conflict that had survived about five years and several contractor turnovers was caught on an AEP project in West Virginia before it turned into rework or wasted material. A Transmission Construction Representative (TCR) on the oversight team spotted a mismatch between the specified wire size and the disconnect box. The TCR team documented the concern in KYRO and raised it with AEP's engineering lead. The result for AEP: zero schedule impact, zero budget impact, and no customer outage.
American Electric Power (AEP) delivers electricity to 5.6 million customers across 11 states and operates the largest electric transmission system in the country, with 40,000 line miles. Its substation and transmission projects can span years.
When projects stall, contractors turn over and the people who made the original engineering decisions move on. The drawings and specs stay, but the knowledge behind them does not.
The handover and change management is not always smooth. This creates a lot of issues for the utility. Ultimately, the utility depends heavily on its current oversight team to catch what everyone before them missed – the oversight team is often the last line of defense between engineering and construction.
On an AEP project in West Virginia, a new station service feed was being built. The prints called for 750 MCM copper wire to be run into a 400-amp disconnect box.
The project had already been delayed about five years. During that time, there had been several contractor and material turnovers. The people who originally specified the wire size were long gone, leaving the current crew to work directly from the inherited prints.
An TCR on the oversight team reviewed the spec and paused. The question was simple: could the disconnect lugs on a 400-amp box actually accept 750 MCM copper wire?
The TCR flagged the concern on the spot. The oversight team documented it in their own records within KYRO and raised it with AEP's engineering lead.
A joint check with station supervisors confirmed exactly what the TCR suspected. The lugs were not compatible with that wire size. If the crew had pulled the wire and tried to terminate it, the problem would have surfaced only after the material was cut, the labor was spent, and the outage schedule was actively at risk.
Engineering ordered a new voltage drop study. The study showed that 500 MCM copper had enough capacity for the application. The revised wire size was approved, and the crew built it without any disruption to the outage schedule.
The error was caught before it ever turned into rework or wasted material.
While KYRO was the oversight team's own system of record and AEP ran its own processes, the team's ability to spot the problem and arrive prepared with documented facts came from the discipline of working in KYRO.
Every long-running project on your system carries inherited risk. Engineering specs written years ago, drawings that have passed through multiple contractors, and assumptions that nobody on the current crew was around to question.
The utility does not need to manage the oversight team's tools. But when that team has a system of record that keeps documents current and captures concerns on the spot, the utility gets better defense against errors that would otherwise go unnoticed until they become expensive.
